The World Federation One Stop Fiqh
Search
Menu

4. Fasting (Ṣawm)

‘Fasting’ means that one abstains from eight things – which will be mentioned later – from the start of the time of morning (ṣubḥ) prayers1 until the time of maghrib, 2 in humility and obedience to the Lord of the worlds.

1 In the original work, the term ‘morning call to prayer (adhān)’ is used, which practically speaking means the start of the time of the ṣubḥ prayer. The legal definition of ṣubḥ is stated in Ruling 728.

2 For the legal definition of maghrib, see Ruling 722.

+ Read more
  • Ruling 1659

    Gargling a lot is disapproved for a fasting person, and if after gargling one wants to swallow his saliva, it is better to spit out the saliva three times [before swallowing].

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1660

    If a person knows that by gargling, water will unintentionally or forgetfully enter his throat, he must not gargle; however, if in this case he does gargle but water does not enter his throat, then based on obligatory …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1661

    If in the month of Ramadan, after investigating, it is not known to someone that the time of ṣubḥ prayers has set in, and he does something that invalidates a fast, and afterwards it becomes known that it …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1662

    One cannot break his fast if he merely doubts whether it is maghrib or not. However, if one doubts whether it is ṣubḥ or not, he can do something that invalidates a fast even before investigating.

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1663

    If an insane person becomes sane, it is not obligatory on him to make up the fasts that he did not keep when he was insane.

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1664

    If a disbeliever becomes a Muslim, it is not obligatory on him make up the fasts that he did not keep when he was a disbeliever. However, if a Muslim becomes a disbeliever and then becomes a Muslim …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1665

    One must make up a fast that he did not keep due to intoxication, even if he consumed the intoxicating thing for the purposes of treatment.

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1666

    If someone does not fast for a few days due to a legitimate excuse and afterwards doubts when his excuse expired, it is not obligatory on him to fast more days than what he deems probable as having …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1667

    If someone has qaḍāʾfasts left over from a number of previous Ramadans, it does not matter which Ramadan he keeps qaḍāʾ fasts for first. However, if the time for the qaḍāʾ of the last Ramadan is short – …

    + Read more
  • Ruling 1668

    If a person has to keep qaḍāʾfasts for a number of Ramadans and he does not specify in his intention which month of Ramadan he is keeping a qaḍāʾ fast for, it will not be regarded as the …

    + Read more